Thursday, March 20, 2025

Franchise Fatigue (3)

Sam Wilson first appeared in the Captain America comic book as long ago as 1969: when it was still being directly written by Stan Lee. The two of them rapidly became partners; and the comic was called Captain America and the Falcon (on the cover, if not in the indica) from 1971 to 1978. A young black guy scripted by a middle-aged Jewish guy was always going to be problematic: the Falcon found it hard not to begin sentences with “Well, as a black man in modern day America, I…” But the writers’ hearts were generally in the right places. Steve Rogers personified World War II and the Greatest Generation; Sam personified the America of civil rights and racial equality. If superheroes are symbols then “a partnership between a negro and a caucasian” is a pretty good symbol of 1960s liberal America. And he was never obliged to go by the name of Black Falcon. 

The idea that other people apart from Steve Rogers can take on the nom de guerre of Captain America goes back a long way. Fans can debate “how many canonical Captain Americas have there been?”: but we can all agree that William Naslund and William Burnside took over the role in the late 40s and 50s while Steve Rogers was missing presumed frozen; that Roscoe Simmons and John Walker tried out for the job in the ’70s and ‘80s when Steve was undergoing his bi-annual crisis of faith; and the newly resurrected Bucky took up the shield in 2007 after Steve’s death. (SPOILER: He got better.)

This stuff happens because it’s cool and interesting. Thor has been an alien horse and a frog, as well as a lady. In movie-land, where actors get older and want to move on to new projects, it’s a commercial necessity. The custodians of the Marvel Cinematic universe could have gone down the path of replacing Sean Connery with George Lazenby and hoping that no-one noticed. It could, indeed, have created an endless stream of not very closely related Captain America movies with an inconsistent cast. But having decided that all the Marvel Movies are part of one very long story, it was inevitable that Steve Rogers and Tony Stark would fade away and new Captains America and Iron Men would arise. 
In 2015, comic book Steve Rogers had his super-soldier powers removed [SPOILER: He got better]. And so finally his best friend Sam got a turn at being Captain America. Previous incumbents didn’t advertise the change-over to the general public—the whole point of William Burnside is that everyone thought he was the original Cap. But the All New Captain America had an all new costume—a combination of Old Cap’s and the Falcon’s threads. 

The film universe reflects this development, with Sam refusing to take the Super Soldier Serum and relying on his flying suit and robot drones to beat the bad-guys. I guess that the multiverse meta-plot is building to a total reboot of the universe, and we will eventually have a new series of films in which new actors get bitten by new radioactive spiders, discover new hammers in new caves and get injected with new experimental anti-Nazi steroids, and the whole thing reboots again in, say, 2048. When we’ll all be dead, or at any rate, incredibly bored. 

Anyone saying that they have made Captain America into a black man as part of some nefarious DEI initiative is not only a Nazi who wants punching, but also terribly ignorant of comic book history.


Superheroes are symbols. Captain Democracy fighting Captain Commie with the Mighty Shield Of Liberty is not that far removed from Sir Purity riding out from Castle Chastity to fight the Dragon of Lust. If allegory isn’t to your taste, Captain Democracy can be a real person with a real personality who consciously knows he is role-playing a symbol for the benefit of his adoring fans. But wandering around in a spandex romper suit is not a particularly naturalistic thing to do. 

You may think that I am making a circular argument here. You may think that “all superheroes are symbols” only works if you say that “costume wearing enhanced-individuals with no particular symbolic subtext don’t count as superheroes”. I am cool with you thinking that.

In 1953, while Steve Rogers was still deep frozen, a substitute hero, the aforementioned William Burnside, went into action as, er, Captain America Commie Basher. In 1972, he came out of cold storage and fought Original Cap on the White House Lawn. He was working for a corrupt president, definitely not called Richard, who turned out to be (if I am remembering this correctly) an evil robot. Our Steve quit in disgust, temporarily becoming Nomad, the Man Without a Country. I think that is the sort of at right-angles to reality symbolic political cartoon strip allegory that I’d like to see more of. I am pretty surprised they’ve never introduced 1950s anti-commie Cap into the MCU. [*]

I’ve been reading some old 1970s comics. The Defenders, as it happens, one of the second wave of Marvel comics that came along after Stan Lee ceased to be actively involved. It was sometimes billed as a non-team: Doctor Strange used to call together the Silver Surfer, the Sub-Mariner and the Hulk whenever the world needed saving: they were good friends but had no formal team affiliation. Which meant that writers could play around with an endless stream of guest stars and crossovers. Maybe Daredevil is in it this month and the Son of Satan next month.There are frequent footnotes which say “It happened in the last issue of the Hulk’s own magazine” or “See Daredevil #123, still on sale if you hurry.” 

At one point, Steve Gerber was writing both the Defenders and Marvel Two In One, and didn’t shy away from threading storylines from one comic to the other and back again. He also had the Son of Satan gig and accidentally created Howard the Duck. I pay Marvel Comics some money every month so that every Marvel Comic there has ever been can pop up on my I-Pad at the push of a button; so it is trivially easy, if rather time consuming, to read every single relevant episode. In the actual 1970s that would have been all but impossible, even if you had an infinite supply of pocket money. Comics came into shops in random piles and when they were gone they were gone. Which made them significant, precious objects to be read and reread until their resale value was diminished beyond repair. 

Today-Fans get quite agitated if they are trying to read the Whole Canon and find that a story alludes to material they haven’t got access to. But I think in the 1970s the idea that the story spread out across many different comics and no-one could reasonably be expected to read all of it was part of the aesthetic. That, is, after all, how life works: Duncan’s story overlaps with mine insofar as we are both in Miss Griffiths’ class; but I don’t know that Duncan has quarrelled with Brett because we go to different Scout groups. At no point does Steve Gerber rely on you knowing extra-textual information. Daredevil might conceivably say “I can’t save the world with you today, Doctor Strange, because I am trying to bring down the Purple Prune’s crime empire, asterisk, footnote, see Daredevil issue twenty three, best wishes, Rhetorical Roy, end footnote” but those things were never crucial plot-points. The Marvel Universe was young and a lot of the characters were meeting for the first time. Luke Cage could say “Sweet Christmas, who is this Thor cat of whom you jive?” and Doctor Strange would bring us all up to speed. 

But increasingly there is So. Much. Marvel. Universe. And so much data. So much revision. Echo, on the TV, about a deaf Native American who can talk to her ancestors and has previous with the Kingpin. Have we seen her before? Was she in that Hawkeye one I remember quite liking, the Christmas before the Christmas before the Christmas before last? I distinctly remember liking Wandavision, possibly in that era where we didn’t go to work and wore masks and were only allowed out of the house once a day? That was the one which starts out as a Bewitched skit and turns out to be kind of a Marvel Universe version of the Prisoner, only with in-jokes? I am pretty sure that Agatha Harkness was in it, and I am pretty sure that she was in the last Doctor Strange movie three years ago and I distinctly remember when someone of that name was Franklin Richard’s nanny. Agatha All Along seems to be working pretty well as a mystical road movie, nodding its head to American Gods. (Can we still mention American Gods?) The relationship between the witch and the very mysterious kid is rather cool. But I keep having the urge to freeze frame and find out if the next character they meet on The Road is someone I am meant to have heard of. 

And sometimes it matters. I was disappointed with Marvels (the movie) because it seemed to reduce the very believable Kamala and her very believable family into components in a big superhero computer game; where I really wanted three more seasons about schools and mosques and conventions and town planning. But a lot of the time I was simply lost—why is it funny that the cat has tentacles? and what is the other Captain Marvel’s backstory again? And I have watched all this stuff. Me and sofa-buddy pretty much abandoned Loki Season II which seemed to be impenetrable without going back and watching Loki Season I all over again. Which we didn’t quite feel inclined to do. 

I don’t wish to intrude on private grief. I have taken a leave of absence from Doctor Who, but someday I will come back to it… Yes, I shall come back. But the threatened Russel T Davies “Marvel Universe Style” Cinematic Whoniverse would kill my interest irrevocably.

[*] This was a very complex retcon: there had really been a 1950s Captain America comic in which Captain America really fought communists; and then-writer Steve Englehart wanted to incorporate that into official canon despite Captain America having been doing his Rip-Van-Winkle routine all through the 50s. The 1950s Cap wasn’t actually named as Burnside until 2010.




This is the third part of a long-form article. Join my Patreon to read the whole thing right now.

patreon.com/rilstone

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Franchise Fatigue (2)

General Thunderbolt Ross definitely comes from the comics. He was J Jonah Jameson to the Hulk’s Spider-Man, or, at times, Captain Ahab to the Great Green Whale: the non-player character who hates the main good guy for no very good reason. That was very much part of the Format: Chris Claremont felt obligated to supply his pisspoor Captain Britain with a bad tempered British peeler who hated superheroes because his daughter or possibly wife had been killed by one. The Red Hulk was one of those very-last-thing-you-expected twists that comic books love to do. The Green Hulk was being menaced by a Big Red version of himself, and it was eventually revealed that Red Hulk was his old foe General Ross come back from the dead to haunt him. Not a bad twist if you were there: but there is something quite tiring about watching every single member of every single supporting cast—Gwen Stacey, Flash Thompson, Jane Foster—gradually being transformed into either a superhero or a supervillain. 


Ross was a major character in the Incredible Hulk movie. It followed Stan Lee’s excellent plot-engine: Ross despises the weak Bruce and hates the strong Hulk; his daughter Betty is scared of the strong Hulk but loves the weak Bruce. There is a big scene at the end of Captain America: Brave New World in which Ross and Betty are finally reconciled. Because in the Incredible Hulk she was mad at Dad for trying to kill the Hulk even after Dad learned he was really Bruce. 


But that was very nearly twenty years ago. 


I mean, maybe I am the wrong sort of nerd, or maybe I love Tolkien and Star Wars too much and the Marvel Cinematic Universe not enough. Apparently Thunderbolt Ross has appeared once or twice since 2008. And very possibly when Harrison Ford is introduced as President Ross, maybe you thought “Cool, that politician guy from Avengers: Civil War who had a brief cameo in Endgame, I have been wondering what happened to him, I sure hope he makes it up with his daughter.” 


And maybe I should have thought that too. But I didn’t.


A very long time ago I was inordinately rude about a TV show called Babylon 5 because (I said at the time) it was a story arc in search of a story; a sequence of weak, sub Star-Trek episodes which moved fairly interesting playing pieces around a quite well developed science fiction backstory. It probably had more merit than I gave it credit for, although, god knows, I have no intention of ever watching it again to find out. It made clever use of early CGI to create an iconography which was neither exactly like George Lucas nor exactly like Gene Roddenbury. And the backstory that was unfurled at such tortuous length was relatively interesting. But I think I would stand by the very rude essay: it aspires to a condition where the person who has only read the Wikipedia page was no worse off than the person who had watched the TV show. The factual summary was just as interesting as the actual episode. It was a back-story delivery mechanism.


 I know people who adopted this exact approach to Harry Potter: reading Wikipedia instead of JK Rowling. There are people who sincerely prefer David Day to JRR Tolkien.

Now, I am a very long way from wanting to be inordinately rude about the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Captain America: Brave New World is perfectly penetrable, and loads of fun. There is a new President; and a new guy in the Captain America suit. The New Cap goes to Washington with New Cap’s New Sidekick and the Old Guy who the government once experimented on; and the Old Guy tries to assassinate the President. Although it is obvious to everyone that he has been mind-controlled, New Cap has to spend the movie clearing his friend’s name. (It turns out that he has been mind-controlled.) There is an absolutely stonking sky battle in which New Cap and New Cap’s New Sidekick have to prevent rogue American fighters triggering a war with Japan (over the body of the dead space god from the Eternals movie). It turns out that a Villain with a grudge against the President has been doing the mind-controlling. He has also been feeding the President drugs laced with PlotDevicium, the same substance that originally turned Bruce Banner into Hulk. So during a press conference, the President loses it completely, turns into Red Hulk and has an absolutely stonking fight with New Cap and New Cap’s New Sidekick. Lots of throwing people through buildings and destroying historical monuments and people staggering back onto their feet after they are down for the count. A real sense of Red Hulk being the strongest one there is and New Cap having huge amounts of guts to stand up to him. It’s a really impressive fight scene. But for anything to be really riding on it, we have to be keeping track of quite a lot of plot threads from quite a lot of previous movies. Otherwise it is just a really really impressive fight scene. Did I mention that I really, really like really, really impressive fight scenes?


Who is the film for? Audiences who just come for the fight scenes and don’t expect to know what is going on? Or people who do their homework and read the character studies in Brodie’s Notes the night before the exam? Or should we posit the existence of people who have watched everything in the franchise seventeen times and who know who Ruth-Bat Seraph is without anyone telling them? 


Quite a lot of us are somewhere in the middle. You know that you know; some people don’t know that they don’t know. But I know that I don’t know, and I sometimes find that a little frustrating.


Disney is burning through the core Marvel Characters at a rate of parsecs; exhausting the mythic potential of the Big Names (Hulk, Spider-Man, Thor) and having to replace them with teams of Second Division characters. 


The Second Division characters are pretty good. I liked the first Ant Man movie. Ms. Marvel (comic book and TV show) is some of the most superhero related fun I have had in years. I liked the Eternals: I suppose  someone had to. I wish I’d liked Shang Chi more. Truthfully, I hankered for something more like the 1970s version, although I fully understand that the 1970s version was ever so slightly incredibly racist.


Kenneth Brannagh’s Thor movie was so good that it ruined Thor: he told pretty much all the Thor stories that there are and left his successor's with nowhere else to go. In a comic, you can throw a different villain at a character every month for six hundred and twenty one months: Thor fights a bank robber; Thor fights commies; Thor fights Loki; Thor fights commie alien bank robbers in league with Loki. When you only get one movie every two and a half years, that’s not going to be artistically satisfying. So the Marvel Cinematic Thor has grown into an entirely different character: which is in one sense Good, because it means the character has growth and development, but in another sense Bad because you sit through each movie saying “So, remind me, has Asgard still been destroyed, where is he living nowadays, is Odin currently dead, is Loki a good guy or a bad guy this week…?” 


Batman and Superman reboot on an annual basis; but it always remains the case that Superman is an alien disguised as a journalist, and Batman is a screwed up rich kid with a cave in his basement. The endless multiple versions are even quite fun: what will the Joker be like this time; who will this year’s Alfred be? But Superman and Batman are myths, and myths are what Hollywood understands. Having exhausted the mythical elements of Thor and Captain America in the first couple of movies there is nowhere else for them to go. 


The correct approach would have been to embrace the fact that superhero stories are really about the villains. The follow up to The Tragedy of Peter Parker is not The Tragedy of Peter Parker Part II: it’s The Tragedy of Otto Octavius, featuring Peter Parker as the personification of divine nemesis. That is one reason why the 1992 Batman animated series is still held up as an exemplar of how to adapt comics to other media.


Captain America’s main enemies have always been Nazis. Sometimes Commies and sometimes Eye Rakkies, I grant you; but he always ends up fighting Hydra (thinly disguised Nazis), the Sons of the Serpent (thinly disguised Nazis) and the Red Skull (a not at all thinly disguised Nazi)

So. Here we are in 2025. The Red Skull is running America, and his minions are very cross indeed with Captain America: Brave New World. 



This is the second part of long-form article. Join my Patreon to read the whole thing right now.

patreon.com/rilstone

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Franchise Fatigue

Captain America: Brave New World was a good movie. 


But The Falcon and the Winter Soldier was a very good television series. I might actually be inclined to say that the Falcon and the Winter Soldier was the most interesting thing anyone has done with Captain America since Ed Brubaker violated the ultimate taboo, brought Bucky back from the dead, and rewrote the mythos so comprehensively that no-one quite realised what he was doing. The TV show drew very deeply from the history of the comic books: Isaiah Bradley, the black man who the American government experimented on, comes from a relatively obscure 2003 comic called Red, White and Black; The USAgent goes right back to a 1980s storyline about Steve Rogers quitting his Captain America gig. But you didn’t need to have read any of the comic books to understand what was going on: it was simply mining old stories to create new ones. 


I grok that Brubaker was a bit annoyed by this. Twenty years on, “everybody knows” that Bucky became the Winter Soldier, where perhaps they ought to still be saying that Ed Brubaker had the audacity and chutzpah and creative disregard for canon to come up with the completely bonkers idea that Cap’s long deceased kid sidekick was alive and well and operating as a mercenary. Writers and artists have got a right to be annoyed by this kind of thing. But Marvel Comics exists and the Marvel Cinematic Universe exists. Jack Kirby threw the ball and Steve Englehart caught the ball and Brubaker only gets to hold the ball on condition he passes it on to someone else. This is why it is nonsense for fans to insist on comic book accuracy. There are no comic books to be accurate to. There are multiple traditions. 


“I want it to be comic book accurate” is usually code for “I don’t want there to be any black people in it”, in any case. 



Some Star Wars fans deplored the fact that the (very good) Mandalorian TV show included some hardware lifted from an old computer game. This was a symptom of a condition called “being up yourself”, apparently. Other Star Wars fans felt that they were debarred from watching the (also very good) Ahsoka TV show because it utilized a character from a cartoon show that they had not, and did not want to, watch. But some of us positively like the baroque complexity of a narrative which emerges non-sequentially, over decades, in more formats than one person can possibly hold in their head. 


CS Lewis said that what the human imagination likes is either taking in a harmonious and self-explanatory form at a single glance; or getting lost in a hugely complicated maze that it will never fully grasp. The Parthenon and the Fairy Queen are both great works of art. So perhaps this kind of fan schism is simply a new iteration of the old, old war between the classical and the romantic. 


Still other fans objected to the (also pretty good) Skeleton Crew TV show because it didn’t have much bearing on the Star Wars metaplot. It’s certainly got lightsabers and spacecraft and recognisable aliens but it doesn’t notably impact on the sacred timeline. I myself have some doubts about whether “the Famous Five, only space pirates” was a great premise for a series, although I smile wryly when people complain that it is “like a children’s show”. My main problem was the paucity of imagination that envisions a galaxy far, far away in which middle-class suburbs look exactly as they do in the American midwest. But that problem has been brewing ever since Obi-Wan went into a diner and put Anakin and Amidala on a greyhound bus. 


And some Star Wars fans objected to the Mandalorian, Ahsoka, and Skeleton Crew because they had black people in them. 


There is Wim and his little friends, trying to extract their spaceship from a garbage crusher. If you don’t think that was the most exciting sequence to appear in a Star Wars spin off since a long time ago, I am not sure I have anything else to say to you. And there are the Sith and the High Republic and Darth Plagueis and Groku’s true identity. There is plot and metaplot; there are movies and franchises; there is this movie and all the movies together. There is chess, and there is a game of chess. Only yesterday I heard someone say that Ncuti Gatwa is not very good as Doctor Who and the solution is, and I quote to reboot the franchise


The solution is never to reboot the franchise. 


Ncuti Gatwa is, incidentally, a black man.



Superheroes are archetypes. There is a mild mannered science geek who turns into a fierce green monster if you rub him the wrong way. There is a Norse god stuck in a crippled mortal body until he learns humility. There is an apparently hopeless GI who personifies the stars and stripes and punches Hitler. 


Superhero movies are action-packed entertainments, whose target audience wouldn’t know an archetype if they stubbed their toe on one, in competition with Mission Impossible and Harry Potter and the Rings of Power. 


Superhero franchises—and there is really only one successful one—are great big huge vast overarching metastories. Soap operas that wish they were actual operas.


When Nick Fury popped up unannounced at the end of the first Iron Man movie, it was a jaw-dropping cinematic conceit. We are now as far removed from that first Iron Man movie as Iron Man was from…something which came out seventeen years before Iron Man. Batman Returns, possibly. There had been sequels before, and captions that said “James Bond Will Return”. The people in Jaws 3 knew about Jaws 1. But the idea of one movie bleeding into another movie was a huge, self-affirming pat on the head to all of us who were bullied and belittled for reading obscure American publications when we were kids. It was even more surprising when Robert Downey Jnr and Samuel S Jackson turned up a year later to recruit Edward Norton. Hell, they are serious about this? Twenty years later we still piously sit through ten minutes of credits (hi, Dan, you are definitely my second favourite set-dec-gang-boss) to find out—what? That there will be another movie, with another baddie, and that it will have something to do with the effing sodding bloody multiverse? 


It used to be said that some movies only had highlights so there was something to include in the trailers. Now we suspect that some movies only exist in order to be teased at the end of other movies. The world’s second richest man recently bought James Bond and everyone assumes that he is going to make, not a new James Bond film, but a whole series of interconnected movies set in the 007 Universe. I understand that the Beano now has an internal continuity. Donald Duck has had one for decades. Any day I expect to see Macavity the Mystery Cat teaming up with Oliver Mellors because they are both part of the Faber and Faber extended universe. Which would, I grant you, be awesome.





This is the first part of long-form article. Join my Patreon to read the whole thing right now.

patreon.com/rilstone

Thursday, March 06, 2025

The last refuge of a scoundrel

1: I love my Dad.

2: I love my Dad because he is my Dad.

3: I love my Dad because I feel that he is the best Dad.

4: I love my Dad because he is objectively the best Dad.

5: My Dad is objectively the best Dad and I will fight anyone who says he isn’t.

6: My Dad is objectively the best Dad and he should be allowed to forcibly adopt all the other children in the whole world.



1: I love my Dad

2: I love my Dad because he was a great Dad

3: I love my Dad because, even though he was not always a great Dad, he is still my Dad.

3:I love my Dad because, although he was not always there for me when I was a kid, sometimes cheated on my Mum, and one time got mad and hit me, he is nevertheless my Dad

4: I do not love my Dad, because he was not always there for me when I was a kid, cheated on my Mum and one time got mad and hit me. But he is still my Dad.

5: My Dad sometimes cheated on my mum and hit me, but he also bought me better presents than he could afford and took me to drive-in-movies and baseball matches. Like most people, he sometimes got it right and sometimes got it wrong. I love the person he actually was, not an idealised version of him.

6: My Dad is objectively the best Dad and therefore the not being there, cheating, and hitting are objectively good things and I will fight anyone who says they aren’t.



1: I love my Dad

2: I would like my Dad to have the best pension, the best medical care and the most luxurious rest home.

3: If it came to a straight choice, I would give my Dad the best medical care, the best pension and the most luxurious rest home at the expense of your Dad, because he is my Dad and yours isn’t.

4: My Dad objectively deserves the best pension, the best medical care and the most luxurious rest home because he is objectively the best Dad in the world.

5: I want your Dad to have a worse pension, a worse doctor, and a worse retirement flat than mine, because he is an objectively worse Dad than mine, and because any nice things he gets are by definition nice things my Dad isn’t getting.

6: I want my Dad to have nice things because he is my Dad; you probably want your Dad to have nice things because he is your Dad. The best way to decide who gets the nice things is for me to fight you for them, and for the weak to go to the wall.

7: I want my Dad to have nice things because he is my Dad. You probably want your Dad to have nice things because he is your Dad. So it follows that we should arrange things so all Dads get nice things, by some kind of, I don’t know, sharing.

8: If that means my Dad gets slightly fewer nice things so your Dad can have slightly more nice things, then that is fair enough: one of the reasons I think my Dad is the best Dad is that he brought me up to believe in sharing.

9: If there really aren’t enough things to go around — if it is really impossible for all Dads to have nice things — then we are obviously running the country in the wrong way, and all the working folk should get together, take the money that the rich are hoarding, and use it to pay for pensions, doctors, retirement homes, etc.

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Work In Progress -- Available.



The first section of my major new work in progress is now available as a PDF. 

Contents

I: War - What is it good for?         7

II: The Meaning of ‘The Meaning of Meaning’ 19

III: The Poet, the Tourist, and the Waterfall. 31

IV: The Voyage of the Italic         51

V: The Horse and His Australian         65

VI: The Importance of Having Bathrooms 75


Bibliography         93

Synopsis of Waterfall Story         95


Free to Patreon supporters; or $8 for purchase. 









 

Friday, February 07, 2025

A Complete Unknown

On 28th August 1963, at the Washington Memorial, shortly before Martin Luther King gave a quite well known speech, Bob Dylan performed Only a Pawn in Their Game. If you had been there, you would have heard it. The brief clip we see in A Complete Unknown is as close to the real footage as the director can make it.

On May 17th 1966, during a performance of Like a Rolling Stone at the Free Trade Hall in Manchester, a disgruntled folkie really did heckle him with the word “Judas!” If you’d been there, you would have heard it. Dylan really did reply “I don’t believe you!” In the movie he tells the band to “Play it loud”; on the bootleg you can distinctly hear him say “Play it fucking loud.”  But the event is transplanted to the 1965 Newport Folk Festival.

Dylan definitely did premier the song at that event. Some of the audience certainly booed, although they weren’t as hostile as the Manchester crowd. Did Pete Seeger really try to terminate the set by cutting the PA cables with a fire axe? That’s the story; you probably heard it from someone who heard it from someone who heard it from someone who was there. So perhaps we should call it an oral tradition; perhaps more appropriately, a folk tale. Seeger subsequently said that his problem was not with the volume or the amplification but simply that the PA was so distorted that you couldn’t hear Dylan’s lyrics.

On January 29, 1961, Bob Dylan certainly visited Woody Guthrie in Greystone Psychiatric Hospital. (“Wardy Forty”, Woody called it.) But no-one knows what they said to each other. Dylan, in his sort-of autobiography, pointedly doesn’t tell us. Bob certainly wrote Song To Woody (to the tune of Guthrie’s own union song, 1913 Massacre) but there’s no reason to think that he actually sang it to him on that first visit. 

The story of Dylan gatecrashing a live recording of Rainbow Quest (Pete Seeger’s public access TV show) is pure fiction; but the scene catches Dylan’s arrogantly modest charm to a T.

There is no reason to think that it was Johnny Cash who leant Dylan a guitar for his Newport encore. But the made up incident perfectly encapsulates the story that the movie is telling us. Old versus new, folk versus rock, conformist versus rebel, acoustic versus electric.

There is what happened. There are stories about what happened, which we hear second or third or fourth hand from people who were almost definitely there. There are people’s honest reconstructions of the kinds of things which probably must have happened. There are stories which people make up out of their heads to tell a version of the truth, or to comment on what really happened. And there are out and out lies. 

Religious fundamentalists and religious skeptics would insist that only the first kind and the last kind count. If it didn’t really, really, really happen, then it’s a lie.


Someone once asked Rowan Williams, the then Archbishop of Canterbury, if he believed that Three Kings really visited the baby Jesus. “It’s a legend” he said “But it works quite well as a legend.”


Todd Hayne’s absurdist I’m Not There turned Bob Dylan into six different fictional characters. None of whom are called Bob. The final incarnation is an aging Billy the Kid who faked his death and is still hunted by Pat Garett. (Dylan, of course, wrote Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door for the movie Pat Garett and Billy the Kid.) "Billy" represents Bob as he was in 2007, when the film came out. At the end of the movie, the aged gunslinger hitches a ride on a train and finds the guitar which belonged to “Woody”—the eleven year old black kid who represents the early, pre Greenwich Village Robert Zimmerman in the open segment. The message appears to be that Dylan ceased to be true to himself when he transitioned from folk to rock, and that his later career was a return to his authentic roots. 

Which works: if you think that Blonde on Blonde was an aberration and Good As I Been To You was a return to form.

At the end of A Complete Unknown, Bob Dylan—having just deliberately ruined the Newport Folk Festival—tries to return a harmonica to Woody Guthrie. Woody gave it to Pete Seeger to give to Bob as a gift. But Woody won’t take it back. Scoot McNeary looks astonishingly like the late photos of Woody Guthrie, and manages to bring a large amount of characterisation to a man who, at this stage in his life, could barely move. They say acting is all about the eyes. (Are we okay with an able-bodied actor being cast as a man with late-stage Huntingtons?) It’s a scene rich with symbolism. Guitar or harmonica? Woody or Johnny? Folk or rock? (Own up: you thought, just briefly and for a second, of Luke and Rey, didn’t you?) Woody watches as Bob rides off on his bike, and Dusty Old Dust plays on the sound track one last time. Bob has moved on, and Woody can accept that he’s moved on; but Pete Seeger can’t.

Which may, for all I know, be, true. Woody Guthrie was nothing if not an iconoclast.

Pete tells Bob to take care on his motorbike. I was very much expecting the final caption to be that a year after Newport, Dylan crashed his bike and didn’t tour for eight years. (It decides to tell us about some Swedish literary award, instead.) Are we supposed to be able to fill this detail in for ourselves?

There are a whole lot of stories you could tell about Bob Dylan. There were a whole lot of mornings between 1961 and 1966. The Beatles' story has a known trajectory—Quarry Bank, Hamburg, Cavern, Palladium, India, Dakota. (Phillip Norman got it down to four words: Wanting, Getting, Having, Wasting.) Dylan is mostly still about the music. I suppose you could make a movie about how the radical firebrand came out of retirement to record an album of Christmas carols, or how he found, and perhaps more interestingly lost, Jesus. But “how Bob went electric” is as close to being a myth as anything is.

Bob arrives in New York. Bob meets Woody. Pete takes Bob under his wing. Bob becomes famous. Bob transitions into a rock star. The fans boo Bob and Pete is sad. The King died and then the Queen died.


I like Good As I Been To You very much indeed. The first time I ever heard Martin Carthy, he opened his act with Jim Jones in Botany Bay, and my first reaction was “Bob sings that.” Dylan is probably covering Nic Jones’ version. Carthy doesn’t feature in A Complete Unknown, although it is mentioned in passing that Dylan has spent some time in London. We don’t see him introducing the Beatles to weed either. Girl From the North Country is a little bit under the influence of Scarborough Fair and Bob Dylan’s Dream is a reskinned Lady Franklin’s Lament. Everything in folk is connected to everything else in folk. That may be what makes it folk.


Films about the lives of famous people; and in particular, films about the lives of famous musicians have a bit of a bad rep. Telling the stories of people who thousands of people worship with quasi-religious devotion. People who are still alive and could sue. Lives which mostly consisted of being driven from concert venue to concert venue in a tour bus. The best possible biography for a writer is “he stayed at home and wrote”.

Jake Kasdan’s wicked parody, Walk Hard, is often said to have killed the genre. Johnny Cash watching a newsreel about Folsom Prison and hoping he never goes there. Johnny Cash in bed with his doomed baby brother, listening to the Carter family and saying “June is my favourite.” Except—hang on, no—those scenes were in Walk the Line, the serious Johnny Cash movie, not the send up.

A Complete Unknown doesn’t completely avoid the cliches of the genre. We do see Bob Dylan waking Joan Baez up in the middle of the night because he can’t think of a good line to follow “He not busy being born…” We do see him strumming an unfinished Girl From the North Country over breakfast at Pete Seeger’s cabin and saying he doesn’t quite know how to end it. We do listen to Pete telling young Bobby things he already knows for the benefit of anyone from posterity that might be eavesdropping.

But it mostly avoids that kind of thing. It doesn’t quite feel real but it does feel like a dusted down polished up Platonic form of what the reality must have been; like a series of glossy album covers coming to life before your eyes. Bob can’t walk through Greenwich Village without passing at least one Man with a Tamburine. It fools us into thinking that we are looking over character’s shoulders and being carried back to the smokey Gaslight Cafe or the fractious Fort Adams State Park. Which obviously we aren’t and obviously we can’t be. But that hardly matters. From this moment, this is what the 1960s will look like and anyone who was actually there will become an increasingly marginalised heretic. It isn’t a matter of printing the legend. The legend has replaced the fact. That’s in the nature of legends.

Bob Dylan is not played by a CGI monkey. He does not help the Mayor of Pepperland defeat the Blue Meanies. Maybe he should have done.


I never saw William Shakespeare take a bow at the Globe or heard Wagner conducting the Ring Cycle. I did once meet Stan Lee, but I was nine and he was looking the other way. But on six different occasions I have been in the same room as Bob Dylan. Big rooms, with a couple of thousand other people in them, but still. I am a folkie and the preeminent artist of our generation is a folk singer. Correlation does not imply causation.

Timothee Chalamet’s face looks enough like Dylan’s to suspend disbelief; and his charisma and sexuality would carry any number of movies; but his attitude and poise and presence are hypnotic and his voice astonishes. When Blowin’ in the Wind plays over the end credits I can’t tell if it’s Timothee or Bob.

How does this stuff even work? Could Timothee have a career as a folksinger if he ever gets bored with the movies? Or can a good actor “act a good singer” without really being a singer himself? (Or is there, perchance, some technical trickery involved?)

We’re witnessing an unrepeatable moment in the history of acting. A moment which has already passed. There are only a few years or months when an actor can play a child turning into an adult. At 29, Chalamet has played his last teenager. The transition from the ingenue who arrives in New York with a guitar slung over his back and the cult figure who snarls “I don’t believe you” to thirteen thousand fans is astonishing from a purely technical point of view. Watching Paul Atriedes grow from an awkward young nobleman into the emperor of the universe was a virtuoso performance even if you aren’t interested in giant worms, but this goes way beyond it. Almost thou persuadeth me to go and see Willy Wonka.

The film is overflowing with fictionalised folk icons; giving it endless replay value for obsessives. The man who gets punched at Newport—that’s folk archivist Alan Lomax. The man who would be happy to let a white blues band play Newport—that’s Paul Yarrow. (We briefly hear Puff the Magic Dragon being played as the older Bob smoulders through Greenwich Village.) But who is the guy singing Irish Rover in the pub? Bob’s civilian girlfriend is called Sylvie, reportedly at Bob’s own request; although surely everyone knows that she represents Suzie Rotolo? Rotolo wrote a book about their relationship and is the subject of a very good song by Ralph McTell, so it is hard to see whose privacy is being protected; although it does feel like a gentlemanly gesture. The word iconic is over-used and should probably only refer to objects of religious veneration. But if anything is iconic, it’s Bob and Suzie/Sylvie on the cover of Freewheelin’, which we catch a brief glimpse of here.

The jester sang for the King and Queen. You either go to the church of your choice or you go to Brooklyn State Hospital. If you are a certain kind of folkie, “Bob visits Woody in hospital” is kind of like “Veronica wipes the face of Jesus.” In this telling of the story, it is Pete who invites Bob to play for his last idol.

“Are you shy?”

“Not usually.”


It’s stuff like this that prevents me from writing an actual review. When a film has literally made you cry before the opening credits have finished, you don’t want to think too much about what it was doing and how it worked. I’ve seen it twice and expect to see it twice more. Sofa-buddy, who likes Dylan fine but is not necessarily the folk-head I am, said that it feels like a completely different movie the second time through: there is so much detail, so much structural nuance, that you could almost believe that you had slept through the first viewing.


Edward Norton inhabits Pete Seeger. Or possibly vice versa. Impersonation and acting are not exactly the same thing: Michael Sheen precisely mimicking Tony Blair’s mannerisms is a different proposition from Anthony Hopkins playing fictional characters based quite closely on Picasso or Freud or CS Lewis. Norton is so good that you wonder if reports of Seeger’s death were exaggerated; or if some kind of deepfake CGI had brought him back from folk heaven.

This kind of film does, indeed, raise questions about Modern Technology. Will we still want to watch brilliant actors pretending to be famous people when computers can create illusions that are realer tham the real thing Does part of our engagement with A Complete Unknown depend on our knowing that what we are watching is not Dylan at Newport but a human being interpreting Dylan at Newport—that what we are watching, despite its factual basis, is a story. (It works quite well as a legend.) What would it feel like to be presented with a 1960s fly-on-the-wall documentary of what Bob Dylan and Joan Baez were doing on the night of the Cuban Missile Crisis while at the same time knowing that it was built of ones and zeroes with no human involvement? (And would that necessarily be more voyeuristic than watching actors role-play the moment—which probably never happened, in any case.)

And come to that, what is the point of getting Paul Atriedes to pretend to be Bob when yards and yards of actual footage exists? We watch Peter Jackson’s Get Back and imagine that we are just watching the Beatles, unmediated, as they were. But in a way it is just as artificial and constructed as King Kong.


You could say that A Complete Unknown is really Pete Seeger’s story: but I notice that El Sandifer has already said that she thinks it is really Joan Baez’s. It’s an old saying that “Doctor Who” is not a name but a question, and the TV show was about the people who have asked the question. Dylan is an enigma; the film plays cleverly with his propensity to fib. Joan only find out that his real name is Zimmerman when she stumbles across a childhood scrapbook. When he repeats the preposterous story of learning guitar from singing cowboys when he worked for a travelling circus, she tells him directly he’s full of shit. But where, in fact, did he learn to play? When Seeger puts him on stage after Joan Baez at a folk club he’s clearly already accomplished musician who knows how to work an audience. If Ramblin’ Jack Eliot gets a mention, I didn’t spot it.

Unless you find his fellow traveller politics unforgivable—and some of the pre 1942 party line pacifism is pretty uncomfortable in hindsight—I have never come across anyone with a single bad word to say about Pete Seeger. He meets Bob and takes him home and puts him on stage and smiles so warmly when the audience start to sing along with the Times They Are A Changin'. When an officious night nurse won’t let him sing Blowin’ in the Wind in the hospital, Bob gets all teenaged and shouty, but Pete calls the nurse by his first name and talks about how he is sure they can smooth it over. It’s just the song. He honestly doesn’t mind that Bob is world-famous while he is still doing public service TV shows provided people are hearing folk music. A shamelessly cartoonish Johnny Cash personifies Bob’s darker angels, positively encouraging him to ruffle feathers and tread mud on the carpet. Seeger is John the Baptist, happy to decrease while Bob increases. But he is also Frankenstein, destroyed by the monster that he himself unleashed. 

Except he’s not destroyed: he smiles and clears away the chairs and carries on. We see him singing This Land Is Your Land on the steps of the court having been convicted by the HUAC for contempt of congress. Half a century later he sang it at Barak Obama's inauguration. 

It’s hard not see Dylan as a bit of a prick: a shy, unsure of himself prick in the first half, and a supremely confident prick in the second. Could he really not have played an acoustic set at Newport and launched his electric career in some other venue? We see him in a double act with Joan Baez, realising that the audience only want to hear Blown’ In The Wind, refusing to sing it, claiming that his guitar is broken, and storming off stage, leaving Joan to carry the set like a trouper. I understand that singers aren’t juke boxes. I understand that Bob had moved on. Like Mitch in A Mighty Wind, he knows that that man no longer exists. I never once heard Chumbawamba play Tubthumping, although Boff Whaley is very upfront about how being a one-hit wonder bankrolled all the more interesting things he’s done since. But Ralph McTell, who has for decades primarily been a very accomplished bluesman endlessly, graciously, revisits Streets of London. “As long as you want to hear it, I want to play it.” Present day Bob sometimes sings Blowin’ in the Wind and sometimes sings All Along the Watchtower and sometimes sings Desolation Row but never ever does a greatest hits concert. The closest I ever came to witnessing a Judas! moment was at a Cardiff concert when two out of every three songs were from the Frank Sinatra covers album.

Bob plays Blowin’ In The Wind on Woody’s iconic guitar, the one with This Machine Kills Fascists printed on it. (Pete Seeger’s banjo had “This machine surrounds hatred and forces it to surrender” on it which tells you everything you need to know.) But a guitar isn’t a particularly traditional instrument. Real cowboys would have had squeeze boxes or fiddles or mouth harps. Woody took a song about a steam train and turned it into a song about a hydroelectric plant. Authenticity is a mirage; this stuff isn’t as old as we sometimes like to think. A lot of the “traditional” English repertoire was probably written for actors playing the roles of peasants in eighteenth century theme parks.

The Manchester footage exists. Some of the fans were angry; someone really did shout "Judas!" (Someone else shouted “What about Woody?”: I’m surprised that didn’t make it into the film.) Doubtless folk audiences are more genteel today than they were back then. The most hostile reaction I have ever witnessed is polite applause. (When Dylan toured with Mark Knopffler in 2007, it was the non-folk part of the audience who started to slow hand-clap Michael McGoldrick and John McCusker’s instrumentals.) When Jim Moray started to put electronic samples and night club beats into an otherwise traditional repertoire, some journalists tried to build him up as the bad boy of English folk. But the traddies embraced him almost immediately, because he was clearly very interesting and more importantly very good.

The film constructs the conflict as if the rebellion against acoustic folk is a rebellion against fame itself. Joan Baez, at the end of the film, says that Bob has freed himself from “us and all our shit.” And that reads pretty well into the Newport set, with “I ain’t gonna work on Maggie’s farm no more…” being a personal Declaration of Independence, and “how does it feel to be on your own” clearly about someone walking out on someone, and even his conciliatory acoustic encore, “its all over now baby blue” also about a break up. And he’s just broken up with “Sylvie” and done a live Carter-and-Cash style domestic row with Joan through music using “it ain’t me babe” as a weapon.

We don’t hear about Hattie Carol or Emmet Tell or really Medgar Evers. This Dylan isn’t a man with a cause. He’s rebelling against anything on offer. Maybe he really did borrow that coat from James Dean.



Andrew Rilstone is not an AI. 
If you enjoy reading writing written by human beings, the best way of encouraging it is to support us on Patreon.