someone requested context....

There are people who believe Jesus turned water into wine. How do they hold down a job in the 21st century?

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) December 16, 2015

@imhkr Name just one. And remember if you can convert to something or apostatise out of it, it's not a race & criticism of it is not racism.

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 29, 2015

@Vansinne Of course. They would, wouldn't they. I would expect nothing less. Somehow we have to get across that Islam is not a race.

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 28, 2015

"(Fig. 1) literally positions the bicycle as the penis/phallus" Is that how social "scientists" use "literally"? https://t.co/kkSVBlnXvS

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) December 17, 2015

@RichardDawkins no. this is how someone who has nothing to offer survives in a publish or perish system.

— Larry Sullivan (@sullivan_larry) December 17, 2015

@RichardDawkins A quick glance at the article and I'm already sure that I've never read a bigger load of crap.

— Martin (@m_gahan) December 17, 2015

@RichardDawkins I'd like to know how this person even survived their education.

— Ethan Stuart (@XeMurder) December 17, 2015

.@annahm Sokal terminally exposed an entire school of "thought" as pretentious rubbish & you still defend it? Give up & do some honest work.

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) December 18, 2015

Found a woman who's still defending the pretentious bilge exposed by the great Sokal Hoax. So, time to recycle this:-https://t.co/1Wr1rjEUL9

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) December 18, 2015